Audio/Video Transport Y. Hiwasaki
Internet-Draft H. Ohmuro
Intended status: Standards Track NTT Corporation
Expires: August 24, 2007 February 20, 2007
RTP payload format for UEMCLIP speech codec
draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-01
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 24, 2007.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Abstract
This document describes the RTP payload format of an ITU-T G.711
enhanced speech codec, UEMCLIP. The bitstream has a scalable
structure with an embedded u-Law bitstream, also known as PCMU, thus
providing a handy transcoding operation between narrowband and
wideband speech.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Media Format Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Payload Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1. RTP Header Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2. Payload Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2.1. Main Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2.2. Sub-layer data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Payload Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. G.711 interoperability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6. Congestion Control Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7. Payload Format Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7.1. Media type registration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
7.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7.2.1. Dynamic transmission definition . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7.3. Offer-answer Model Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 25
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
1. Introduction
This document specifies the payload format for sending UEMCLIP
encoded speech using the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) [3].
UEMCLIP is an enhanced version of u-law ITU-T G.711, and designed to
help the market for smooth transition towards the forthcoming
wideband communication environment and while maintaining the
interoperability and less transcoding load with the existing
terminals, in which the implementation of G.711 is mandatory.
The payload format is described in Section 3. The interoperability
with G.711 issues are discussed in Section 5. In Section 7.1, a
media type registration for UEMCLIP RTP payload format is provided.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [1].
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
2. Media Format Background
UEMCLIP stands for "U-law EMbedded Coder for Low-delay IP
communication", and is basically an enhanced version of u-law ITU-T
G.711, otherwise known as PCMU [5]. It is developed for VoIP (Voice
over Internet Protocol) applications, and is especially suitable for
wideband multi-point conferencing [8]. The main goal of this codec
is to provide a wideband communication platform that is highly
interoperable with existing terminals equipped with G.711, and to
stimulate the market to gradually shift to the wideband
communication. Because the G.711 bitstream is embedded in the
bitstream, costly transcoding would be avoided especially when
interoperating with narrowband terminals.
This document does not discuss the implementation detail of the
encoder and decoder, but only describes the bitstream format.
[Editing note: The rest of the paragraph are subject to change
according to the form of disclosure, which is yet to be decided.]
The implementation detail will be publicly available from NTT by
other means, and the use of such encoder and decoder implementation
shall be licensed under reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND)
condition. The codec is intended for NTT's Next-Generation Network
(NGN) in which the trial service is launched in December 2006.
Because of its scalable nature, there are a number of sub-bitstreams
(layer data) with in a UEMCLIP bitstream. By choosing appropriate
sub-layers, the codec can adapt to the following requirements:
o Sampling frequency,
o Number of channels,
o Speech quality, and
o Bit-rate.
The current implementation of UEMCLIP codec includes three sub-
coders, as shown in Table 1. The core layer is G.711 core, and other
two are quality and bandwidth enhancement layers with bit-rate of 16
kbit/s each.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
+-------+---------------------+----------+--------------------------+
| Layer | Description | Bit-rate | Coding algorithm |
+-------+---------------------+----------+--------------------------+
| a | G.711 core | 64 | u-Law PCM |
| | | | |
| b | Lower-band | 16 | Time domain block |
| | enhancement | | quantization |
| | | | |
| c | Higher-band | 16 | MDCT block quantization |
+-------+---------------------+----------+--------------------------+
Table 1: Sub-layer description
Based on these sub-layers, UEMCLIP codec operates in four modes as
shown in Table 2. Here, "Fs" is the sampling frequency in kHz. The
absent Modes 2 and 5 are reserved for future extension to 32 kHz
sampling modes. As the mode definition is expected to grow, any
other modes not defined in this table MUST NOT be used for
compatibility and interoperability reasons.
+------+----+----+-------+-------+-------+-------------+------------+
| Mode | Ch | Fs | Layer | Layer | Layer | Bit-rate | Total |
| | | | a | b | c | w/o headers | bit-rate |
| | | | | | | [kbps] | [kbps] |
+------+----+----+-------+-------+-------+-------------+------------+
| 0 | 1 | 8 | x | - | - | 64 | 68.8 |
| | | | | | | | |
| 1 | 1 | 16 | x | - | x | 80 | 85.6 |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | | | | | | | |
| 3 | 1 | 8 | x | x | - | 80 | 85.6 |
| | | | | | | | |
| 4 | 1 | 16 | x | x | x | 96 | 102.4 |
| | | | | | | | |
| 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
+------+----+----+-------+-------+-------+-------------+------------+
Table 2: Mode description
UEMCLIP bitstream contains internal headers and other side-
information apart from the layer data. This results in total bit-
rate larger than the sum of the layers shown in the above table. The
detail of the internal headers and auxiliary information are
described in Section 3.2.1.
Defining the sampling frequency and the number of channels does not
result in a singular mode, i.e., there can be multiple modes for the
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
same sampling frequency or number of channels. The supported modes
would differ from the implementations, thus the sender and the
receiver must exchange what mode to use for transmission.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
3. Payload Format
As an RTP payload, UEMCLIP bitstream can contain one or more frames
as shown in Figure 1.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RTP Header |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
| |
| one or more frames of UEMCLIP |
| |
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Figure 1: RTP payload format
UEMCLIP bitstream has a scalable structure, thus it is possible to
reconstruct the signal by decoding a part of it. A UEMCLIP frame is
composed of a main header followed by one or more sub-layers. As a
sub-layer, the core layer, i.e., "Layer a", MUST always be included.
It should be noted that the location of the base layer may not be
located at the top. The decoder MUST always refer to the layer ID
for proper decoding. The bitstream, for the case of enhancement
header with length 0, is shown in Figure 2, where sub-layer #1 can be
any arbitrary sub-layer data.
+--+-------+-------+-------+-------+//-+
|MH| SD #1 | SD #2 | SD #3 | SD #4 |...|
| | | | | | |
+--+-------+-------+-------+-------+//-+
Figure 2: A UEMCLIP frame (bitstream format)
The UEMCLIP bitstream does not include the following information: a)
the codec type, b) Mode, c) I/O sampling frequency, and d) encoder
version. As described before, these information SHOULD be exchanged
while establishing a connection, for example, by means of SDP.
3.1. RTP Header Usage
Each RTP packet starts with a fixed RTP header, as explained in [3].
The following fields of the RTP fixed header used specifically for
UEMCLIP streams are emphasized:
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Payload type: The assignment of an RTP payload type for this packet
format is outside the scope of this document, however, it is
expected that a payload type in the dynamic range shall be
assigned.
Timestamp: This encodes the sampling instant of the first speech
signal sample in the RTP data packet. For UEMCLIP streams, the
RTP timestamp is based on a 50-kHz clock.
Marker bit: This bit shall not be used and MUST be zero.
3.2. Payload Data
3.2.1. Main Header
The main header (MH) is placed at the top of a payload and has size
of 10 bytes with additional optional enhanced header size. The
content of the main header is defined in Figure 3.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ID | BS | MX |
| | | |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PC |
| |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PC(cont'd) | ES | EH |
| | | (if exists) |
|2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7| ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-//+-+-+-+
Figure 3: UEMCLIP main header format (MH)
Identification (ID): 8 bits
The value should be "0x95".
Byte size (BS): 16 bits
Indicates the byte size of the following UEMCLIP payload. This
means that the RTP header size, ID and BS are not included. It is
encoded in network byte-order.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Mixing information (MX): 8 bits
Mixing information field.
Packet-loss Concealment information (PC): 40 bits
Packet-loss concealment (PLC) information field.
Enhanced-header Size (ES): 8 bits
Size of EH (enhanced header) in bytes.
Enhanced header (EH): 8*ES bits
Content of the enhanced header. When ES is 0, the enhanced header
is non-existent.
3.2.1.1. Mixing information field
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|C|R|V| PW1 |
|1|1|1| |
| | | |0 1 2 3 4|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Mixing information field (MX)
Check bit #1 (C1): 1 bit
Validity flag of V1 and PW1. This bit being "1" indicates that
both parameters are valid, and "0" indicates that the parameters
should be ignored.
Reserved bit #1 (R1): 1 bit
This bit should be ignored.
VAD flag #1 (V1): 1 bit
Voice activity detection flag of the current frame. This flag
being "1" indicates that the frame is an active (voice) segment,
and "0" indicates that it is an inactive (non-voice) or a silent
segment.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Power #1 (PW1): 5 bits
Signal power code of the current frame.
3.2.1.2. PLC information field
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|C|C|R|V| K |R| P1 |R| P2 | PW2 |
|2|3|2|2| |3| |4| | |
| | | | |0 1 2 3| |0 1 2 3 4 5 6| |0 1 2 3 4 5 6|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| R5 |
| |
|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: PLC information field (PC)
Check bit #2 (C2): 1 bit
Validity flag of V2, K, P1, P2, and PW2. If the flag is "1", it
means that all these parameters are valid, and "0" means that the
parameters should be ignored. If any of these parameters is
invalid, C1 should be set to "0".
Check bit #3 (C3): 1 bit
Payload validity indicator. This flag is normally set to "0". If
a received packet has this flag set to "1", the payload data
should be ignored and packet-loss concealment should be performed
by the receiver. This flag is used in case of a multi-point
conferencing, where the upstream packet was lost and the mixing
server did not execute packet-loss concealment.
Reserved bit #2 (R2): 1 bit
This bit should be ignored.
VAD flag #2 (V2): 1 bit
Voice activity detection flag of the current frame. This may be
as same as V1 in the mixing information.
Frame indicator (K): 4 bits
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
This value indicates the frame offset of P2 and PW2. Since it is
a better idea to carry the pitch and power parameters as PLC
information in a different frame, this frame offset value gives
which frame the parameters are to be associated with. Since there
are 4 bits allocated, it ranges between "0" and "15".
Reserved bit #3 (R3): 1 bit
This bit should be ignored.
Pitch lag #1 (P1): 7 bits
Pitch code of the current frame. The actual pitch lag is
calculated as P1+20 samples in 8-kHz sampling rate. Pitch lag
must be 20 <= pitch length <= 120. Codes ranging between "0x65"
and "0x7F" are not used.
Reserved bit #4 (R4): 1 bit
This bit should be ignored.
Pitch lag #2 (P2): 7 bits
Pitch code of the offset frame. The actual pitch lag is
calculated as P2+20 samples in 8-kHz sampling rate. Pitch lag
must be 20 <= pitch length <= 120. Codes ranging between "0x65"
and "0x7F" are not used. The offset value is defined as K.
Power #2 (PW2): 8 bits
Signal power code of the offset frame. The offset value is
defined as K.
Reserved bits #5 (R5): 8 bits
These bits should be ignored.
3.2.2. Sub-layer data
Sub-layer data (SD) is a sub-header followed by layer bitstreams, as
shown in Figure 6. The sub-header indicates the layer location and
the number of bytes.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
0 1 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+//-+-+-+
| CI| FI| QI| R6| SB | LD ... |
| | | | | | |
|0 1|0 1|0 1|0 1|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+//-+-+-+
Figure 6: Sub-layer format (SD)
Channel index (CI): 2 bits
Indicates the channel number. For all modes given in Table 2,
this should be "0x1". The detail is given in Table 3.
Frequency index (FI): 2 bits
Indicates the frequency number. "0" means that the layer is in the
base frequency band, higher number means that the layer is in
respective frequency band. The detail is given in Table 3.
Quality index (QI): 2 bits
Indicates the quality layer number. "0" means that the layer is in
the base layer, and higher number means that the layer is in
respective quality layer. The detail is given in Table 3.
Reserved #6 (R6): 2 bits
Not used (reserved). The value must be "0".
Sub-layer Size (SB): 8 bits
Indicates the byte size of the following sub-layer data.
Layer Data (LD): SB*8 bits
The actual sub-layer data.
3.2.2.1. Layer index encoding
The layer index is encoded using values of channel number, quality
number, and frequency-band number encoded with 2-bits each, in the
appearing order. The last 2 bits are reserved for future use, and
all implementation should ignore this field. For all the layers
shown in Table 1, the layer indices are shown in Table 3.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
+-------+----+----+----+
| Layer | CI | FI | QI |
+-------+----+----+----+
| a | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | |
| b | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | | | |
| c | 0 | 1 | 0 |
+-------+----+----+----+
Table 3: Layer indices
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
4. Payload Examples
(to be written)
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
5. G.711 interoperability
As given in Section 2, G.711 (u-Law) bitstream (Layer a) is the core
layer, and is always embedded. This means that transcoding from
UEMCLIP bitstream to G.711 does not have to undergo the usual
decoding and re-encoding procedures, but simple extraction would only
suffice. However, this does not apply for the reverse procedure,
i.e., transcoding from G.711 to UEMCLIP, because the side information
in the main header must be calculated separately.
The transcoding from UEMCLIP to G.711 can be done easily by finding
an appropriate sub-layer. The transcoder should look for a sub-layer
with the layer index of 0x00, and subsequent LD which has size of
SB*8 bits (usually for 20ms frame, SB=160) are the actual G.711
bitstream data. It should be noted that transcoder should not expect
the core layer to be located right after the main header.
On the other hand, the transcoding from G.711 to UEMCLIP is not
entirely straight-forward. For the main header contents, it should
follow the following guidelines.
o ID must be set "0x95".
o Byte size (BS) should be set 7 bytes of the main header, plus sub-
header size (2) added with number of samples in G.711 (SB) .
o The enhanced-header size (ES) set to "0x00".
o The check bit for mixing and PLC (C1 and C2) should be set 0.
o The payload validity indicator (C3) should be set 0.
For the sub-layer header, it should be
o All CI, FI, QI, R6 MUST be 0.
o Sub-layer size (SB) MUST be 160 for 20ms frame.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
6. Congestion Control Considerations
The general congestion control considerations for transporting RTP
data apply to UEMCLIP over RTP [3] as well as any applicable RTP
profile like AVP [4]. UEMCLIP does not have any built-in mechanism
for reducing the bandwidth. Packing more frames in each RTP payload
can reduce the number of packets sent, and hence the overhead from
IP/UDP/RTP headers, at the expense of increased delay and reduced
error robustness against packet losses.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
7. Payload Format Parameters
7.1. Media type registration
This registration is done using the template defined in [6] and
following [5].
MIME media type name: audio
MIME media subtype name: UEMCLIP
Required parameters: (T.B.D.)
Optional parameters: (T.B.D.)
Encoding considerations: This type is defined for transferring
UEMCLIP-encoded data via RTP using the payload format specified in
Section 3. Audio data is binary data and must be encoded for non-
binary transport; the Base64 encoding is suitable for e-mail.
Security considerations: See Section 8 "Security Considerations" of
this document.
Interoperability considerations: See Section 5 of this document.
Published specification: (T.B. assigned)
Applications that use this media type: Audio and video streaming and
conferencing tools.
Additional information: None
Intended usage: COMMON
Person & email address to contact for further information: Yusuke
Hiwasaki <hiwasaki.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Author/Change controller:
Author: Yusuke Hiwasaki
Change Controller: IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group
delegated from the IESG
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
7.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters
Payload type: Since it is not registered in [4], any RTP packets
that carry UEMCLIP as payload type MUST be treated as a dynamic
payload type.
Codec name: MIME registered codec name should be used.
Sampling Frequency: Depending on the mode to communicate, sampling
frequency MUST be selected from the ones defined in Table 2.
Channel numbers: It SHOULD default to "1", as selected from the ones
defined in Table 2.
Packet intervals: Since frame length of any UEMCLIP is 20ms, when
specifying a=ptime line, the argument MUST be a multiple of "20".
When not listed in SDP, it should also default to the minimum
size: "20".
Bandwidth: As described in [7], bandwidth line is OPTIONAL. When
there is no bandwidth restrictions, the numbers MUST be the
largest value out of the Table 2, and the unit should be
``kbit/s'' with the fraction raised to the unit, including header
overheads down to Layer 3. If any restrictions apply, then the
value MUST be the largest of the Table 2 that satisfy the
restriction, by the same calculation procedure. It MUST NOT
encode with bit-rate larger than the answered bit-rate bandwidth.
UMECLIP specific: Any description specific to UEMCLIP are defined in
the Format Specification Parameters (fmtp). Each parameters MUST
be separated with ";", and if any attributes (value) exists, it
MUST be defined with "+". For compatibility reasons, any
application/terminal MUST ignore any parameters that does not
appear below. This is to ensure the upper-compatibility with
later added parameters for the future enhancements.
7.2.1. Dynamic transmission definition
Since UEMCLIP codec can operate in number of modes, it is desirable
to specify the range of modes that an encoder or a decoder can
operate at.
UEMCLIP decoders are designed to accept bitstreams in any modes.
However, the implementation limitation may fail to adopt to the
dynamic bit-rate change. Thus introduced here is two concepts:
"dynamic mode" (denoted as "dynmode"), where the dynamic mode (bit-
rate) change is allowed, and "fixed mode" (denoted as "fixmode"),
where the change is not permitted. Both modes MUST be used
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
exclusively.
"fixmode" is used to specify no modification of the operating mode
(bit-rate) during the session. It MUST operate exclusively to
"dynmode". It should specify the possible combination of mode
numbers, delimited by commas ",". When offering a "fixmode", the
offerer SHOULD list the mode numbers in descending priority order.
The answerer MUST select a single suitable mode number and reply as
"fixmode" with one argument.
On the otherhand, "dynmode" is used to allow modification of the
operating mode during the session. It MUST operate exclusively to
"fixmode". The offerer should specify the possible combination of
mode numbers, delimited by commas ",". The answerer can either
select a number of suitable modes and reply as "dynmode" in the same
manner, or select a single sitable mode number and reply as "fixmode"
with one argument.
The mode numbers that can be specified as arguments to "fixmode" or
"dynmode" are restricted by a combination of a sampling frequency and
a number of audio channels, as shown in Table 2. This is because SDP
binds a payload type to a combination of a sampling frequency and a
number of audio channels. When a "fixmode" or "dynmode" is not
given, it MUST be interpreted as being defaulting to the fixed mode
("fixmode") and MUST use the default value specified in Table 4.
+---------+----------+------------------+--------------+
| Fs [Hz] | Channels | Selectable modes | Default mode |
+---------+----------+------------------+--------------+
| 8000 | 1 | 0,3 | 0 |
| | | | |
| 16000 | 1 | 1,4 | 1 |
+---------+----------+------------------+--------------+
Table 4: Default modes
7.3. Offer-answer Model Considerations
The procedures related to exchanging SDP messages MUST follow [2].
o When multiple UEMCLIP dynamic payload type number is offered, an
answerer SHOULD select a single payload type number, i.e., one
sampling frequency and channel condition.
o The ptime SHOULD be 20.
o An offerer SHOULD offer every possible combination of sampling
frequency, channel number, and fmtp parameters including dynamic/
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
fixed mode. When the transmission bandwidth is restricted, it
MUST be offered in accordance to the restriction.
o When offering/answering SDP, any fmtp parameters which are
undefined MUST be ignored. If any unknown/undefined parameters
should be offered, an answerer MUST delete the entry from the
answer message. In this case, the offerer MUST use the default
value for any deleted parameters.
o If a dynamic mode ("dynmode") is offered, an answerer MUST select
either "dynmode" or "fixmode", according to ones capabilities.
When fixed mode ("fixmode") is offered, an answerer MUST only
answer "fixmode". In the case of answering fixed mode
("fixmode"), answerer MUST select a single mode out of offered
mode, regardless of dynamic/fixed mode specification. If a mode
is not offered at all, the session MUST default to fixed mode, and
the default mode value, as shown in Table 4, MUST be used, based
on the sampling frequency and number of channels specified
elsewhere.
o When an offered condition does not fit an answerer's capabilities,
it naturally MUST not answer the conditions, and session MAY
proceed to re-INVITE, if possible. If a condition (mode) is
decided upon, an offerer and an answerer MUST transmit on this
condition.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
8. Security Considerations
RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
specification [3] and any appropriate profiles. This implies that
confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption.
A potential denial-of-service threat exists for data encoding using
compression techniques that have non-uniform receiver-end
computational load. The attacker can inject pathological datagrams
into the stream that are complex to decode and cause the receiver
output to become overloaded. However, UEMCLIP covered in this
document do not exhibit any significant non-uniformity.
Another potential threats are memory attacks by illegal layer indices
or byte numbers. The implementor of the decoder should always be
aware that the indicated numbers may be corrupted and does not point
to the right sub-layer or the allows reading beyond the bitstream
boundaries.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
9. IANA Considerations
It is requested that one new media subtype (audio/UEMCLIP) is
registered by IANA. For details, see Section 7.1.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[2] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model with
Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264, June 2002.
[3] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson,
"RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64,
RFC 3550, July 2003.
[4] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for Audio and Video
Conferences with Minimal Control", STD 65, RFC 3551, July 2003.
[5] Casner, S. and P. Hoschka, "MIME Type Registration of RTP
Payload Formats", RFC 3555, July 2003.
[6] Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 4288, December 2005.
[7] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
10.2. Informative References
[8] Hiwasaki, Y., Ohmuro, H., Mori, T., Kurihara, S., and A.
Kataoka, "A G.711 Embedded Wideband Speech Coding for VoIP
Conferences", IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., vol.E89-D no. 9,
September 2006.
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Authors' Addresses
Yusuke Hiwasaki
NTT Corporation
3-9-11 Midori-cho,
Musashino-shi
Tokyo 180-8585
Japan
Phone: +81(422)59-4815
Email: hiwasaki.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp
Hitoshi Ohmuro
NTT Corporation
3-9-11 Midori-cho,
Musashino-shi
Tokyo 180-8585
Japan
Phone: +81(422)59-2151
Email: ohmuro.hitoshi@lab.ntt.co.jp
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP February 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Hiwasaki & Ohmuro Expires August 24, 2007 [Page 25]